If you thought the Very Dark Man and Bobrisky saga was over, then you’re in for a long run.
Very Dark Man made a post on Instagram, showing the petition he wrote against Bobrisky. In the letter, Very Dark Man first introduced himself as a consumer rights activist, and a social media moral values influencer.
The petition Very Dark Man wrote against Bobrisky was related to the fact that Bobrisky displayed amorous relationships with his fellow men online, and some product owners took advantage of this by paying him to make adverts for them.
Very Dark Man mentioned the law that Bobrisky allegedly broke by citing section 4(2) of the Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition Act), which prohibits the public display of same sex amorous acts, whether directly or indirectly.
To further buttress his point, Very Dark Man mentioned the punishment prescribed for breaking the aforementioned law, which is ten years imprisonment.
In his caption, Very Dark Man wrote;
“ My petition received by the DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,after EFCC finish their own,WE MOVE TO THE NEXT STAGE…..the law is the law. he should answer, if he is innocent then Goodluck to him, if he is found guilty then lets see the connection and let’s see the law”
Very Dark Man has been on Bobrisky’s case for a hot minute now. It all started from one jab from Very Dark Man, to which Bobrisky responded, and then it escalated into this.
On more than one occasion, Very Dark Man has expressed his disgruntlement for cross dressers in Nigeria, and he has always used Bobrisky as a point of reference.
Very Dark Man has vowed to rid social media of cross dressers, even though he has nothing against gay people. He once mentioned that he wasn’t a saint, but he wouldn’t stand for people to openly live their lives as cross dresser.
This petition is the second step Very Dark Man has openly said he would take in his fight against cross dressers. At first, he said that if the police doesn’t arrest Bobrisky, he would start dressing and acting like a woman, while following hajiya’s into the restroom, since there was freedom of expression in fashion.
